Thursday, July 30, 2015

Writers: Original or Copycats with Class? - Addison Norman

Writers: Original or Copycats with Class?


            From the time a young child learns to notice, comprehend, and remember he or she begins to accumulate knowledge. As one expands their knowledge they can start to make connections between similarities and differences. In his chapter, “Now, Where Have I Seen Her Before?” Thomas C. Foster encourages his readers to use their accumulated knowledge to notice similarities in stories, especially “to remember this: there’s no such thing as a wholly original work of literature.” 
            After introducing the idea that writers use previous works to inspire their stories he expands on the stories taken from Shakespeare. Romeo and Juliet, is one of Shakespeare’s most renown works, and the story has been implanted into our thoughts. It is almost impossible to watch or read modern works without coming across the tale of star-crossed lovers. We see the idea of fate and power of love juxtaposed by uncompromising circumstances that surround love. This can be seen in a number of stories, both old and new. From older texts, one can find Romeo and Juliet paralleled to Jane Austen’s Pride and Prejudice. In another adaptation, the musical West Side Story mimics the struggle of forbidden love seen in Shakespeare’s play. Both Pride and Prejudice and West Side Story use elements from Romeo and Juliet. The lovers are inhibited from being together whether it be for the strict English class system or for the rivalry of New York City gangs.
            Foster also mentions that writers tend to employ stories from the Bible. Christianity is a dominant religion of Western culture, and as a result, has become a fundamental element of English literature. Allusions and symbols of revelation and redemption are found in a variety of literary works. The Lord of the Flies by William Golding calls on ideas from Christianity to communicate themes. Some analyze the island the schoolboys land on in the novel as a representation of the Garden of Eden. The island is a clean slate for the boys and is described as a paradise; however, the temptation of power and control lead the boys to self-destruction and destruction to the island. It appears that the loss in innocence experienced by Adam and Eve can be compared to the loss of innocence the boys in the Lord of the Flies partake. Golding represents how not only young children lack innocence, but all humans do as well and are subject to temptations.
            Authors are influenced from stories older than the Bible and Shakespeare – ancient Greek stories. One well-known tale that still finds itself intertwined in literature is the epic, The Odyssey. The Odyssey tells of the many challenges Odysseus goes through to return home to his wife. Cold Mountain by Charles Frazier is one novel in which the main character, Inman, is trying to escape the war to go home to his love Ada. Along the way Inman’s quest encounters numerous road stops and people who prolong his arrival home much like The Odyssey. The Greek story can even be found in film. In the movie O Brother, Where Art Thou?  characters, Ulysses, Pete, and Delmar, are escaping from imprisonment, and they face similar situations to Odysseus. In one scene in O Brother, Where Art Thou? the characters come across beautiful women singing in a river; these women correspond to the Sirens in The Odyssey who lure men to their death and distract them from the quest.   

Writers pull ideas from multiple pieces of previous work. However, the Bible, Shakespeare, and Greek stories are three areas in which writers are consistently influenced by. New works aren’t all just copies of older texts; authors use the stories weaved into our consciousness as a way to communicate something deeper than the words on the page. As Foster constantly reminds us “there’s only one story.”


                                    



Wednesday, July 15, 2015

There's More to the Story: Physical Appearances and Marks - Addison Norman

There’s More to the Story: Physical Differences
Addison Norman

            In literature we often see writers mentioning physical qualities on characters; from first glance it could appear as nothing significant and some times it is just an insignificant fact. In the chapter “Marked for Greatness,” Foster explains that theses characteristics often have an importance, deeper than a character’s appearance.
            In the chapter, Foster mentions physical indicators of deeper meaning in the novella Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde by Robert Louis Stevenson. In the story Stevenson creates a character with a dark side representing the duplicity in human nature. The evil character, Mr. Hyde, carries several features that help the audience infer the nature of Mr. Hyde’s temperament. In most cases Hyde is described as not looking human and quite animalistic. This is representative of the instinctive, uncivilized actions Dr. Jekyll committed when he was Mr. Hyde.
In literature it is popular to see the antagonist marked in some way that separates them from others; in the chapter Foster helps his readers uncover the value of the markings.  A number of classic stories include antagonist characters that are initially separated due to their appearance; The Wizard of Oz, Lion King, and Batman are just a few examples of the literary trend. The Wicked Witch of the East has a bright green skin; Scar has a large scar down his cheek, and the Joker has scars surrounding his mouth. Each of the characters have aspects of evil in which are underscored by their physical appearance. This helps the audience notice the ominous presence the antagonist has to the protagonist.
An in depth example can be found in the short story, “Where Are You Going, Where Have You Been?” by Joyce Carol Oats. Oats employs symbolic physique effectively in her description of Arnold Friend. In the story Connie, a teenage girl, is on the path toward lost innocence and Arnold Friend is a foreboding character in the background appealing her toward evil. Then one afternoon Connie is put face to face with Arnold Friend, along with his temptations.  Multiple times throughout the plot the narrator notices Friend’s appearance. Arnold Friend is described as having a thick, curly, black, and greasy head of hair, a heavy face of makeup and a dark pair of sunglasses over his eyes. From this combination a reader can already set Friend off as different. As the story progresses, Oats mentions the boots Friend wears. The boots don’t look right on his feet, and they point different directions. Because of this imbalance, Friend almost fell over. The arrangement of images leads a reader to see something fake about Friend. If one looks even further, Friend’s handicaps and look merged together to express that Friend has goat qualities: curly hair, boots to cover hooves, heavy makeup. A goat in some beliefs is a way Satan can be depicted. Arnold Friend is acting as a devil in disguise, which fits perfectly with the story’s context. Friend is attempting to lure Connie away from innocence.
Not only are antagonists marked in literature, but also other dynamic characters often have aspects that are substantial to the theme. For example, the Lord of the Flies by William Golding is another piece of literature in which the author creates physical qualities that aid in the underlying topic of the book. In Lord of the Flies a group of young schoolboys are deserted on an island with no parental supervision; the boys actions shed light on the truths of human nature’s need for power while examining societal flaws. One main character, Piggy, is the boy in the novel that is different from the other boys; he has multiple handicaps including terrible vision without his glasses, asthma, and is physically out of shape compared to the other male characters. These characteristics initially separated Piggy from the other boys. In addition to this Piggy is often described as having a flush, pink-toned skin; Golding is illustrating Piggy to actually look like a pig. Piggy representing a pig by appearance foreshadows Piggy’s significance by the end of the novel.  In the end of the novel, all humanity is lost among the boys, and Piggy is killed. Piggy’s death represents the boys’ depletion of all civilization and unity with savagery. Piggy is that archetypal scapegoat of the boys’ human nature and his physical appearance underscores this aspect.
After reading Foster's chapter, I'm able to look deeper than just on the surface. By being mindful of a character's physical appearance one can begin to notice the character's true nature.